N J L M

 
Subscribe Via RSS
  • Home
  • About
    Salient Features Bibliographic Information Abstracting and Indexing Specialties Covered Publisher Journal Policy
  • Issues
    Current Issue Online Ahead of Print Archive Forthcoming issue
  • Editorial
    Editorial Statements Editorial-PeerReview Process Editorial Board Publication Ethics & Malpractice Join us
  • Authors
    Submit an Article Manuscript Instructions Manuscript Assistance Publication Charges Paid Services Early Online Publication Service
  • Reviewers
    Apply as Reviewer Reviewers Acknowledgment
  • Search
    Simple Search Advanced Search
  • Member
    Register Login
  • Contact
  • Subscription
Original article / research
Year: 2024 Month: July Volume: 13 Issue: 3 Page: BO01 - BO03

Comparison of Liquid Sodium Heparin Syringe and Preheparinised Syringe for Sample Rejection in Arterial Blood Gas Analysis: A Cross-sectional Study

 
Correspondence C Sumithra N Unni, Sreejith J Kishore, PP Sajitha Krishnan,
Dr. C Sumithra N Unni,
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Viswavidyapeetham University, AIMS Ponekkara P.O., Kochi-682041, Kerala, India.
E-mail: sumithra.unni234@gmail.com
:
Introduction: In hospital settings, Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis is a routine investigation. Many errors can arise in the process, with 70% of errors in ABG analysis occurring during the preanalytical phase. Liquid heparin is commonly used as an anticoagulant in sample collection devices for Blood Gas (BG) analysis; however, inadequate heparin concentration and improper mixing of blood samples after collection often lead to incorrect results. This can be prevented by using syringes preloaded with lyophilised heparin.

Aim: To monitor the prevalence of sample rejection collected by the device using liquid sodium heparin and calcium-balanced dried lithium heparin.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the ABG laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Viswavidyapeetham University, Kochi, Kerala, India over a 4-month period from December 2022 to March 2023. ABG samples collected using either of the techniques were included, while venous BG samples were excluded. The sample size was 10,957 for each of the two groups- Group A and Group B. Group A included samples collected using liquid sodium heparin, and group B included spray-dried, calcium-balanced lithium heparin from different departments. The incidence of blood clots, air bubbles, and inadequate volume was studied. For all categorical variables, the results were expressed as the frequency and percentage of errors. An unpaired t-test (two-tailed) was used for data analysis.

Results: In comparison with liquid sodium heparin collection, errors in the quality of the specimen such as blood clots (1.7% to 1.1%), air bubbles (0.04% to 0%), and inadequate volume (0.2% to 0.03%) were significantly reduced (p-value=0.002) with spray-dried, calcium-balanced lithium heparin (BD Preset™ Safety BG Syringe).

Conclusion: The present study found that using calcium-balanced lithium heparin syringes over manually flushed liquid sodium heparin syringes reduces the risk of clots, thus preventing equipment malfunction and maintenance costs. With the introduction of preset syringes, the chance of air bubbles and insufficient volume can also be overcomed.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 
Print
  • Article Utilities

    • Readers Comments (0)
    • Article in PDF
    • Citation Manager
    • Article Statistics
    • Link to PUBMED
    • Print this Article
    • Send to a Friend
    • Go To Issues

      • Current Issue
      • Past Issues
  • Search Articles

    • Simple Search
    • Advance Search
  • Authors Facilities

    • Extensive Author Support
    • Submit Manuscript
    • ONLINE First Facility
    • NJLM Pre Publishing
  • Quick Links

    • REVIEWER
    • ACCESS STATISTICS
  • Users

    • Register
    • Log in
  • Pages

    • About
    • Issues
    • Editorials
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Search
    • Contacts
  • Issues Archives

  • Affiliated Websites

    • JCDR Prepublishing
    • Neonatal Database Home
    • JCDR Neonatal Database download center