N J L M

 
Subscribe Via RSS
  • Home
  • About
    Salient Features Bibliographic Information Abstracting and Indexing Specialties Covered Publisher Journal Policy
  • Issues
    Current Issue Online Ahead of Print Archive Forthcoming issue
  • Editorial
    Editorial Statements Editorial-PeerReview Process Editorial Board Publication Ethics & Malpractice Join us
  • Authors
    Submit an Article Manuscript Instructions Manuscript Assistance Publication Charges Paid Services Early Online Publication Service
  • Reviewers
    Apply as Reviewer Reviewers Acknowledgment
  • Search
    Simple Search Advanced Search
  • Member
    Register Login
  • Contact
  • Subscription
Original article / research
Year: 2016 Month: April Volume: 5 Issue: 2 Page: 25 - 29

Phenotypic Expression of erm Gene Among Staphylococcus aureus

 
Correspondence Gaurav Dalela, Atul Vijay, Manoj Joshi,
Dr. Gaurav Dalela,
Associate Professor and HOD, Department of Microbiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur – 302033,
Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: gauravdalela29@gmail.com
:
Introduction: The increasing frequency of MRSA infections and rapidly changing patterns in antimicrobial resistance, led to renewed interest in the use of macrolide lincosamide– streptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics to treat such infections.

Aim: To assess the prevalence of phenotypic expression of inducible resistance for clindamycin due to expression of erm genes, in clinical isolates of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus from various clinical samples using modified D test.

Materials and Methods: A total of 101 Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains were included for induction tests which utilize closely approximated erythromycin, clindamycin and azithromycin discs (modified D test); the flattening or indentation of the clindamycin zone of inhibition adjacent to the erythromycin and / or azithromycin disk indicates inducible MLSB (macrolide lincosamide– streptogramin B) resistance.

Results: Among the 101 clinical isolates, 37 (36.63%) isolates shows D test positive using Erythromycin, Clindamycin and Azithromycin combination. Inducible resistance to clindamycin using azithromycin was found in 5.94% isolates which was the major achievement of the study, which will be confirmed by genotyping in future.

Conclusion: D-test should be performed on all MRSA isolates, to avoid erroneous reporting resulting in treatment failure, a partial modification in the D test can be made using azithromycin as it was helpful in our study, must be confirmed using genotyping.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 
Print
  • Article Utilities

    • Readers Comments (0)
    • Article in PDF
    • Citation Manager
    • Article Statistics
    • Link to PUBMED
    • Print this Article
    • Send to a Friend
    • Go To Issues

      • Current Issue
      • Past Issues
  • Search Articles

    • Simple Search
    • Advance Search
  • Authors Facilities

    • Extensive Author Support
    • Submit Manuscript
    • ONLINE First Facility
    • NJLM Pre Publishing
  • Quick Links

    • REVIEWER
    • ACCESS STATISTICS
  • Users

    • Register
    • Log in
  • Pages

    • About
    • Issues
    • Editorials
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Search
    • Contacts
  • Issues Archives

  • Affiliated Websites

    • JCDR Prepublishing
    • Neonatal Database Home
    • JCDR Neonatal Database download center