N J L M

 
Subscribe Via RSS
  • Home
  • About
    Salient Features Bibliographic Information Abstracting and Indexing Specialties Covered Publisher
  • Issues
    Current Issue Online Ahead of Print Archive Forthcoming issue
  • Editorial
    Editorial Statements Editorial-PeerReview Process Editorial Board Publication Ethics & Malpractice Join us
  • Authors
    Submit an Article Manuscript Instructions Manuscript Assistance Publication Charges Paid Services Early Online Publication Service
  • Reviewers
    Apply as Reviewer Reviewers Acknowledgment
  • Search
    Simple Search Advanced Search
  • Member
    Register Login
  • Contact
  • Subscription
Original article / research
Year : 2021 Month : April-June Volume : 10 Issue : 2 Page : MO06 - MO09

Prevalence of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus: A Study from a Rural Teaching Tertiary Care Hospital in Southern Haryana

 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Pratibha Mane,
Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, SHKM, GMC, Nalhar-122107, Nuh, Haryana, India.
E-mail: drpratibhakolte@gmail.com

Introduction: Clindamycin is the most commonly prescribed Macrolides, Lincosamides and Streptogramin-B (MLSB) antibiotics to treat staphylococcal infections. It has excellent pharmacokinetic properties. Staphylococcus species shows either constitutive (MLSBc) or inducible (MLSBi) clindamycin resistance. Routine D-test recommended by Clinical Laboratory and Standard Institute (CLSI) can detect MLSBi phenotype and prevent treatment failure.

Aim: To identify inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci in a rural teaching Tertiary Care Hospital.

Materials and Methods: It was a prospective, cross-sectional study. The clinical samples were cultured on blood agar and MacConkey agar. Staphylococcus isolates were identified based on their colony characteristics, gram stain and standard biochemical test. Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed by Kirby Bauer’s disc diffusion method. To detect Methicillin resistance Cefoxitin disc (30 μg) was used. The isolates that were Erythromycin resistant and Clindamycin sensitive were further subjected to D test. CLSI 2019 guidelines were followed for performing the tests and its interpretation. Epi-info (version 7.2.3.1) Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia was used to analyse the data and interpretation of the results.

Results: Total 150 Staphylococci were isolated from different samples. Staphylococcus aureus were 70% and Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) were 30%. Pus was the most common specimen from which 43% Staphylococci was isolated. Sensitivity to vancomycin and linezolid were 100%. Staphylococcus aureus (38%) and CoNS (33%) were Methicillin resistant. Overall (63%) of staphylococcus isolates were resistant to erythromycin. The different susceptibility patterns to clindamycin in both Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS were noted. MLSBc phenotype was most prevalent (37.3%) followed by MS (13.4%) and MLSBi (12%) among erythromycin resistant Staphylococcus isolate. Sensitive (S) phenotype was detected in 56 (37%). MLSBi was more frequent in Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (23%) and MRCoNS (27%) than in MSSA (5%) and MSCoNS (7%).

Conclusion: D-test should be performed routinely to avoid false susceptible results leading to treatment failure.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 
  • Article Utilities

    • Readers Comments (0)
    • Article in PDF
    • Citation Manager
    • Article Statistics
    • Link to PUBMED
    • Print this Article
    • Send to a Friend
  • Go To Issues

    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
  • Search Articles

    • Simple Search
    • Advance Search
  • Authors Facilities

    • Extensive Author Support
    • Submit Manuscript
    • ONLINE First Facility
    • NJLM Pre Publishing
  • Quick Links

    • REVIEWER
    • ACCESS STATISTICS
  • Users

    • Register
    • Log in
  • Pages

    • About
    • Issues
    • Editorials
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Search
    • Contacts
  • Issues Archives

  • Affiliated Websites

    • JCDR Prepublishing
    • Neonatal Database Home
    • JCDR Neonatal Database download center