N J L M

 
Subscribe Via RSS
  • Home
  • About
    Salient Features Bibliographic Information Abstracting and Indexing Specialties Covered Publisher
  • Issues
    Current Issue Online Ahead of Print Archive Forthcoming issue
  • Editorial
    Editorial Statements Editorial-PeerReview Process Editorial Board Publication Ethics & Malpractice Join us
  • Authors
    Submit an Article Manuscript Instructions Manuscript Assistance Publication Charges Paid Services Early Online Publication Service
  • Reviewers
    Apply as Reviewer Reviewers Acknowledgment
  • Search
    Simple Search Advanced Search
  • Member
    Register Login
  • Contact
  • Subscription
Original article / research
Year : 2020 Month : October-December Volume : 9 Issue : 4 Page : BO05 - BO09

Sigma Metrics-Tool for Quality Assurance in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory

 
Correspondence Address :
Vanitha Gowda MN,
MSR Nagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: vanithasukesh@hotmail.com
Introduction: Sigma metrics is a quality management tool used for process improvement which usually comes into application when there is a measurable outcome in the process. It can play an important role in health care laboratory services as Quality Assurance (QA) of the same, is the need of the hour.

Aim: To gauge the performance of a few biochemical parameters by calculating their sigma metrics on a sigma scale.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was undertaken using Quality Control (QC) and External QA Scheme (EQAS) data for 17 biochemical parameters from Biochemistry section, diagnostic laboratory of an M.S. Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru. Sigma values for these parameters were determined and sigma metrics was evaluated for duration of 13 months.

Results: In level 1 coefficient of variation percentage (CV%), five parameters (ALP, calcium, magnesium, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol) showed an ideal performance of ≥6 sigma level and in level 2 CV%, eight parameters (total bilirubin, urea, creatinine, albumin, AST, total cholesterol, total protein and phosphorus) showed a sigma of ≥6. Quality Goal Index (QGI) for 11 analytes in level 1 and seven analytes in level 2 was <0.8, indicating imprecision. QGI was in the range of 0.8-1.2 for one analyte in level 1 and two analytes in level 2, indicating a problem of both imprecision and inaccuracy.

Conclusion: Sigma metric analysis can serve as a tool to identify the poor assay performance and to assess the efficiency of processes that are in existence. The health care sector can be immensely benefited by implementation of sigma metrics for QA.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 
  • Article Utilities

    • Readers Comments (0)
    • Article in PDF
    • Citation Manager
    • Article Statistics
    • Link to PUBMED
    • Print this Article
    • Send to a Friend
  • Go To Issues

    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
  • Search Articles

    • Simple Search
    • Advance Search
  • Authors Facilities

    • Extensive Author Support
    • Submit Manuscript
    • ONLINE First Facility
    • NJLM Pre Publishing
  • Quick Links

    • REVIEWER
    • ACCESS STATISTICS
  • Users

    • Register
    • Log in
  • Pages

    • About
    • Issues
    • Editorials
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Search
    • Contacts
  • Issues Archives

  • Affiliated Websites

    • JCDR Prepublishing
    • Neonatal Database Home
    • JCDR Neonatal Database download center