N J L M

 
Subscribe Via RSS
  • Home
  • About
    Salient Features Bibliographic Information Abstracting and Indexing Specialties Covered Publisher
  • Issues
    Current Issue Online Ahead of Print Archive Forthcoming issue
  • Editorial
    Editorial Statements Editorial-PeerReview Process Editorial Board Publication Ethics & Malpractice Join us
  • Authors
    Submit an Article Manuscript Instructions Manuscript Assistance Publication Charges Paid Services Early Online Publication Service
  • Reviewers
    Apply as Reviewer Reviewers Acknowledgment
  • Search
    Simple Search Advanced Search
  • Member
    Register Login
  • Contact
  • Subscription
Original article / research
Year : 2019 Month : January-March Volume : 8 Issue : 1 Page : PO22 - PO25

A Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Ceftriaxone-Sulbactam-EDTA Combination for Suspected Biofilm Infections

 
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sunita Gupta,
Department of Medicine, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research,
Mulana, Ambala-133207, Haryana, India.
E-mail: sanjeevguptadr@gmail.com
Introduction: Bacterial biofilms are highly recalcitrant to antibiotic treatment and thus carry important clinical repercussions. In view of rising biofilm-forming pathogens, new antibacterial approaches aimed at disrupting biofilms are needed.

Aim: To determine the clinical utility of CSE-1034 (Ceftriaxone-Sulbactam-EDTA) therapy in suspected biofilm infections.

Materials and Methods: Subjects with Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) or Intra-Abdominal Infections (IAIs) with in-vivo devices (catheters, stents, etc.,) and suspected of biofilm-related infections and who received CSE-1034 as 2nd line therapy were included in this study. Based on susceptibility report, CSE-1034 therapy was started in these patients and continued or discontinued based on improvement in clinical symptoms.

Results: Thirty culture-positive adult patients were included in this study. All the patients had received Pipericillin-Tazobactam (Pip-Taz) or Cefaperazone-Sulbactam empirically but none of them responded clinically. Culture susceptibility results available on day 3 have shown that isolates from 40% patients started with Pip-Taz were reported susceptible to Pip-Taz and 45% of patients started with Cefaperazone-Sulbactam were reported susceptible to antibiotic used. 100% of the isolates were susceptible to CSE-1034, 90% to Meropenem and susceptibility to Colistin was 80%. Based on culture susceptibility report and further treatment modifications done, all the patients were switched over to CSE-1034 as 2nd line treatment. A total of 27 patients responded to CSE-1034 and were cured. However, 3 patients who did not respond to CSE-1034 for 48 hour were switched over to Meropenem and reported to be cured.

Conclusion: From this study, it can be suggested that CSE-1034 should be a choice of treatment over beta-lactam/beta-lactam inhibitor combinations for patients suspected of biofilm infections.
 
[ FULL TEXT ]   |   [ ]
 
  • Article Utilities

    • Readers Comments (0)
    • Article in PDF
    • Citation Manager
    • Article Statistics
    • Link to PUBMED
    • Print this Article
    • Send to a Friend
  • Go To Issues

    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
  • Search Articles

    • Simple Search
    • Advance Search
  • Authors Facilities

    • Extensive Author Support
    • Submit Manuscript
    • ONLINE First Facility
    • NJLM Pre Publishing
  • Quick Links

    • REVIEWER
    • ACCESS STATISTICS
  • Users

    • Register
    • Log in
  • Pages

    • About
    • Issues
    • Editorials
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Search
    • Contacts
  • Issues Archives

  • Affiliated Websites

    • JCDR Prepublishing
    • Neonatal Database Home
    • JCDR Neonatal Database download center